Yesterday, the president of the Ontario Genealogical Society, Shirley Sturdevant offered the opinion of the society on the release of the 1921 census. This was done by releasing a statement on their blog, entitled Library and Archives Canada and Ancestry Partnership Results in Release of 1921 Canadian Population Census.
In
part, the statement says -
“Although The Society is very
pleased that these images are finally available to the public, we are concerned
about its release through a subscription site. The lack of consultation with
Canadian heritage organizations ignored their skills, experience and offers of
assistance. Details of the arrangement are still unfolding and we hope that
answers to our questions will be forthcoming regarding the arrangement between
Library and Archives Canada and Ancestry.
- Was there no Canadian organization that could
handle this?
- Is this deal exclusive to Ancestry?
- Has LAC given away its rights to use the
digitized images later on their own web page, indexed or not?
- Might other organizations have access to the
images and produce their own indexes as has been done successfully in the
past, perhaps then making the information free to all?
- For how long will there be free access to the
raw images or indexed information on the Ancestry.ca site?
- Is there a limit to the number of years
Ancestry will have the sole rights before the census might appear
elsewhere or is this material solely in their hands?
- What of access to the other census schedules?
- Why have the microfilms or images not been
available at Library and Archives Canada until now?
There are
many unanswered questions being asked by our members and others in the heritage
community. We look forward to more details”.
To read the full statement, go to
the web site at www.ogs.on.ca/ogsblog
So what is the nature of the partnership
between the LAC and Ancestry? Does it give such societies, as the OGS, any room
to have their say? Or are they looked upon as outsiders? Interesting questions,
to say the least.
The waters on releasing the
census issue is starting to get muddy. Let us hope that the OGS receives
answers to their questions.
Disclaimer: Although I am
employed by the OGS as editor of their journal Families, the views expressed in this statement are strictly by the
OGS.